History, as they say, is bound to repeat itself at one time or another. In the 1980s, new immigration reforms started attracting more people to the United States, stirring a lot of upset citizens across the country. This was the first time since the mid-1920s that Americans went from creating a society, void of poverty and despair, to a reexamination of their nation's immigration policy. Around this time, the Iranian hostage crisis had taken hold on people who worked in the American embassy, pushing the United States to set further limits on immigration.
In March 1981, the Select Commission on Immigration and Refugee Policy was created to enhance an early United States tradition of barring immigrants from entering this nation using a literacy test and US history test. Five years later, the new Immigration Act was passed by Congress to make some modifications to the drafts of the 1911-20s legislation that was originally set out to reverse American immigration policies. In a way, the new commission of 1981 was dominantly liberal whereas the 1911 body was conservative. The main head in the1980s of this new group, Father Theodore M. Hesburgh, a world champion of an honorary degrees collection of over a hundred, made it the commission's goal to "walk the fine line between honoring America's tradition of being a land of opportunity for the world's downtrodden and dealing with today's harsh realities." Hesburgh's and most of his staff's attitudes were aimed at maintaining the United States' economic prosperity and welfare by strengthening or regaining complete control of its borders. While this popular notion is favored by politicians and citizens alike, even today, this country hasn't taken the issue of our borders seriously enough. It's one of the reasons why we can't find those who are here illegally since there's not a lot emphasis in Washington on creating more restrictions on crossing our borders. Hesburgh's church has a long tradition of defending immigrant rights; however, Hesburgh himself has taken the stand on promoting more restrictive immigration so as to not create a "disservice to our poor and unfortunate" who are desperate for work in this country. Others have argued the exact opposite of this argument.
Economist John Kenneth Galbraith and members of Reagan's Economic Advising Council argued that since American government power is small, the regulating of immigration has lessen enough for more people to come in without being caught. To add, illegal immigrants don't necessarily hurt the economy or American workers; rather they help to increase job opportunites and wages through hard work and their personal investments of starting a better life in the United States. Overall, the efforts these immigrants put into their jobs not only benefit them, but the nation as a whole. The one obstacle, however, is the sentiment from Americans, who argue that many of this country's historical immigrants (Germans, Irish, Chinese, Japanese, etc.) have not helped in improving the standard of living, but lowered it quite a bit. This debate may not end any time soon, but as a nation, we definitely must look into how we should manage our borders, as well as create some kind of program that determines which immigrants can become citizens and who are just here for work or an education.